Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Liberia: Borrowing and Spending on Purpose

Source: THE ANALYST

The debt was US$6.7 million when we signed it. We built the road; we paved the road from Monrovia to Bo Waterside. Not the Cape Mount road. It is just today, and you can see that road.

The debt today is US$13 million (the debt we took for US$6.7 million is US$3 million because we did not pay). Now, there is some reason why we did not pay. It is true that after the coup d’état, we had some economic problems, so the government itself had difficulties in paying.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Liberia: Borrowing and spending on purpose, discovering the survival boots - President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf’s remarks when she appeared on Sky FM Talk-show “5050” on Thursday, July 1, 2010 to explain to the public Liberia’s achievement of the HIPC Completion Point.

5050 Host: When we were coming to this program, one lady saw me on Mechlin Street and said to me “T-max, do not speak your big-big book because we want the Oldma to hear. So I am going to bring it down: “The Money the people cleared, how much was this money?

President Sirleaf: Well, we owed the people US$4.9 billion. If I may explain my statement, that means that if were paying that money, it was going to take us twenty eight years to pay the money we owed. That is a plenty money that can solve plenty problems in Liberia. Now people are asking where that money goes. Others say the money borrowed at the time we were in power. Sometimes, I think people don’t understand this finance business because if they understood it, they would know that when you not paying you debt, it will get double more because the people put interest or penalty on top year after year. The thing we met, the thing we left there in 1980 to where it’s today, is three times more because the people did not service the debt. Now, nobody must blame it on the war. Sierra Leone was in war and they did pay all their debts. They don’t have to go through HIPC business. There are other debts that we have to talk about which went into other people’s account. Look, let me say this. The people who don’t understand it, when the minister comes, he will do a workshop. He will go on the blackboard, and go through all the explanation how we got to the debt we owed, what we did with it, what kind of road we built, or what kind of agriculture program we undertook, and how the debt went from where it was to where it is today. Then all the different things we did to move the debt from where our head, he will go on the board and explain all of this.

5050 Host: That is what I was about to ask you. When people hear that Liberia owes three billion dollars because we did not pay the three million dollars, the question is what did we do with the money and what do we tell them?

President Sirleaf: That is the reason I gave one example of the debt that I know about, the Kuwait Debt. The debt was US$6.7 million when we signed it. We built the road; we paved the road from Monrovia to Bo Waterside. Not the Cape Mount road. It is just today, and you can see that road. The debt today is US $13 million (the debt we took for US$6.7 million is US 13 million because we did not pay). Now, there is some reason why we did not pay. It is true that after the coup d’état, we had some economic problems, so the government itself had difficulties in paying. And also, if you look at the record you will see that plenty money came in during that period. Anyway, let’s just thank God that we are cleared with it and so let’s move forward.

5050 Host: Oldma, we are clear with this one. We thank God after many, many years, we are out of it. Liberians have been suffering, development not coming, because we took something we didn’t pay. Because of this, lender could not trust us. Since we have cleared this debt, what are the things we are going to do? Are we going to start borrowing again?

President Sirleaf: Wait now! We got to be disciplined too. We have established what we call “the Debt Management Committee.” That was one of the triggers. That committee comprises the minister of finance, minister of planning, Central Bank of Liberia and some people from the civil society. Before we take any new loan, it must go through that committee. We also have agreed with the IMF that we are only going to take loan equal to a certain percentage of our GDP. The GDP is all the things you can produce in the country. The forest, the log we send out, the rice we produce, the power you produce, the iron ore and all of that is what they call “Gross National Product” (GDP). Now, we will only do a certain percentage in debt because we don’t want to put the country at risk. We don’t want to leave office, and leave the same kind of problem on someone, like other people left on us.

Every year, we can only do a certain amount of new debt. Also we got to be a good debtor. You see, some of the debts we finished paying are bad debts. US $1.5 billion is what they call “Commercial Credit,” which you can put on the old government head because that was new debt. That’s when people said they built houses. The big houses you see around town unfinished are some. They said they supplied goods. Sometimes the goods come and at times, it did not come. US $1.5 billion of that we were able to buy at three cents for every dollar because when the people bought it, it did not worth anything. So the good [thing] is that we will not pay what they call “supplier credit”. We will take commercial loan from the commercial banks. We will do that. We will take what they call “Concessional Loan”, that is good loan. That is where you go to India or Brazil and borrow money for projects that will make money, or projects that will open up the country. So other people can be able to produce things. That means, we have to take money only to build roads or to fix the port, or to be able to bring power into the city. You will take the loan on the trend where (for example, when we [go] there, they sent a mission here) their loan will take forty years to pay; sixteen years grace [period]. That means, for sixteen years, you are not paying anything. When you start paying after the sixteen years, you will have forty years to do so. That is what they call “concessional loan” and that’s what we will go for. That is the kind of money that we will go for; we will not go for the kind of money that will get people in trouble.

5050 Host: So we finish the entire loan but there is the Paris Club. Don’t we hold them something?

President Sirleaf: Yes, we owe them. The Paris club is the bilateral debt. That is the debt from France, America and all. We got some more debt yet. When you reach the Completion Point, you still have small debt where you still go to what they call “bilateral”, which is the different individual country. They will have to sign with us to say the final debt is off your head. We still got some small debt we still have some problem with. Eh, you know, under the Paris Club, some of the debt not there. Even the commercial debt, we still have some US $20 million which some of the people did not agree to take the three cents that we offered. So, we still got to settle all those small ones before everything will be completely free. But we have gone too far and we can say that we have gone too far.

5050 Host: Now that we are cleared of the debts, what are conditions attached if we want to borrow? Are there conditions attached or not?

President Sirleaf: No, conditions would be attached. Not conditions by the people who lend us the money, but conditions by our own people that this time, the place we put the money, there must be what they call “Productive Something.” That is, we must only use it to fix our roads so our people can see the road, and we must make report all the time. We have to show report as to when the money came in, where it went and many things.

So, the people who are lending us the people, because they know they want to get paid, we don’t want to take that money and put it in some kind of big house. I think, we want to put it in agriculture where we can produce something so you can be able to send something out of the country and get money what they call “reserve.” We want to put it [somewhere where] when we open a road up, private people will be able to come and make their farms and mining people will be able to come. So, those are the conditions that we must use the money for proper save and that debt management committee got to look at it. If somebody wants to lend us some money and if we don’t meet those criteria, they will say no.

Caller: Darius Dillon: I want to say a hearty good morning to President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf. I call this morning to express my deep sense of gratitude to the President of this country, the entire government of Liberia as well as the National Legislature for the enactment of those requisite laws that fast-tracked the process that led us to reaching the Completion Point of the HIPC process that we are benefiting from. I just want to express my deep sense of gratitude as a nationalistic Liberian to President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf for the victory that has been scored. I thought the President would have declared this day a half working day so that we could celebrate.

The President: It is coming from Mr. Dillon who always takes us to task. Let me congratulate Mr. Dillon, at least somebody who is a nationalist. You know when something is good for the country, he is willing to commend it. Thank you Mr. Dillon!

Caller: Willington B. Sombai: Let me, first of all, extend my thanks and appreciation to Almighty God and to you, your entire able men and women in this government that are struggling to see the betterment of Liberia. We have borne another giant step; but my own concern is the issue of corruption. Why people who are accused of corruption, tried and set free are not given their job? For example, former Assistant Postal Minister Terry Genesis who was dismissed, prosecuted, and acquitted. Why has he not been given back his job? [My other concern is] why people coming from college and high school not getting jobs even though they have some training?

President Sirleaf: No. let me say that some of the things he raised are correct; there are things we have to address. At times, I think they feel very frustrated because of a process that takes so long for us to bring people to book when they misuse the public trust. I wish I could go out there and just grab some people and do something. But if I do it, I will be violating people’s human rights. To do it, you have to go through the legal process, send them to court, and they defend themselves. Some of those cases take so long and I myself get frustrated too. That is what I applaud those who say corruption should be a non-billable crime. I endorse it, I will work for it. When the Legislature passes it, I will sign it. It is a tough one, but I agree with it. But let’s put it right. When I dismiss somebody for something I know on the basis of what I have seen, and when the court clears them, we accept the court’s decision. But that’s does not mean, I have to put them back.

5050 Host: Would this thing have ever been easier, Madam President, had it not been your intervention, or it would be the same way it is?

President Sirleaf: Well, I believe that any government, any administration would have gone down the same road, would have tried to get Liberia free of this debt. But there is doubt that it helps that I made those leading efforts because I know the issues, I work with the issues over many years, I know the institutions and boards, I know their policies, I know their rules, I know their conditions and I know the people who are their leaders in these institutions, both bilateral and multilateral. So we were able to do it as fast because I am conversant with the politics to deal with that because this is the work I have been doing for over thirty-five years. So I was able to bring my own knowledge and my own connection to this task and work with young people who themselves worked very hard. So, yes, I had a major part to play in all of these. But any administration would do it and I hope any administrations that follow me will carry on this sound financial management that we are trying to put into place.

5050 Host: This means that your administration will not borrow too much money like previous administrations did?

President Sirleaf: No, I just told you that we have a very good law in place; we have good processes in place that will make sure that we are cautious of any loan we take and that loan must be used from productive purposes.

Caller Albert Chea: I want to congratulate the president for a brilliant step taken. This is a good day for Liberia; it is a very good beginning. To see such huge amount in that tone relieved is something I must be thankful to her for. So, Madam President I only call to say a big thanks to you.

President Sirleaf: Thank You!

Caller Agnes Ehsion: I want to say hello to the studio guest, Madam Ellen Johnson Sirleaf. I want to take this time to congratulate her and the people of Liberia for the bold steps we have taken so far and I know it will have an impact on persons with disability in the Republic of Liberia. So Madam Sirleaf, I want to say thank you and bravo.

President Sirleaf: Thank you, I got your message loud and clear.

Caller-Boakai Jaliebah: My concern has to do with our external debt. I learned that some people sued us for this debt. I want to know from the President how far this has gone.

President Sirleaf: Lot of that debt is what they call “Commercial debt.” That is the US $1.5 billion that we tackled and bought. It must have been up three to six hundred dollars. There is still a US $20 million segment with those who refused to sell at that price. We are working on that one also with the World Bank to see how we can settle that. These are what they called the “Boucher funds.” They bought these debts. Maybe some financial institutions or some suppliers who had debts, they bought it; we don’t know how much they bought it for. Maybe they paid one cent for it at the time because the debt was considered worthless. That means, segment of that loan is still there, and that’s part of the unfinished business that we have to address. But we are working on it.

5050 Host: you say the people bought the debt. How somebody can buy another person’s debt?

President Sirleaf: Well, the first thing goes like this. Let say a bank lends us some money. You don’t pay the bank back, the bank then will decide in their book this debt doesn’t worth anything because it will not be paid back. Somebody else comes and offers the bank. You give us this debt. Try and spread all the papers to us and we will give you one cent for every dollar. The bank says okay.

They have been holding on for all these years waiting for the country to be strong. If it goes up, some of them take you to court and they have taken us to court too. And through the debt relief program, the World Bank helped us negotiate with the people. Let me say this, many of the creditors were also very sympathetic to Liberia. I mean, they could have refused and gone to court and we would have spent lots of money to defend ourselves. So the creditors want to see Liberia succeed. Whether it’s our partner or the institution and even those hard commercial creditors that bought this debt call the Boucher Fund, even they were helpful. The Federal Reserve, which is the Central Bank in America called all of them to a meeting and said to them Liberia needs to be helped. It needs to get out of this problem so they can be able to address the need of their people. We have to thank a lot of people for what they have done for Liberia.

Caller (name inaudible): Well, I will like to congratulate the Madam for the very fine drive that has brought us thus far to reach the HIPC Completion Point. We thank her for the bold step and we know that lots of good things will follow. What I want to know is how does the audit report relate to the entire process of HIPC completion?

President Sirleaf: Look, those particular things have been looked at. I don’t know which particular issue he is talking about; but all corruption cases coming out of the GAC and some other reports, are under investigations. We are even trying to hire some firms to help us read those reports and tell us what has to do with the financial system and what has to with fraud. Those things are under investigation right now.

5050 Host: We finished with debt business. I know you get plenty things to think about; you got schools to build; you have roads and many others. What will be the first thing you will take money for?

President Sirleaf: Now, we are very concerned about our primary roads. We are concerned about the road from Gbarnga to Foya. We are even more concerned about the road from Fish Town to Harper because we are trying to get the private sector in those counties. The private sector, whether is mining, forestry or major agricultural operations is where the jobs will come from to be able to absorb any of the people who are unemployed. But it makes it very uneconomical for the private sector when they don’t have roads to get into the area. So we want to get them there so we got to try and pave those roads, so they can last; so that we don’t have to spend money every year to rehabilitate them. Those are our concentrations now. To get those particular roads paved to increase their mobility, to attract the private sector in those places. Today, we are negotiating. Sam Derby is doing so well. But they do not have to wait for infrastructure because the Cape Mount Road is good. They are doing a great job setting up a nursery for a major oil palm plantation. We have a company from Indonesia to go into the Southeast, which is Sinoe, Maryland. They went on the road and got almost discouraged. So anything we borrow will be for infrastructure. But we might be able to get money on concessional term for infrastructure. It means we will free up some of our budget money. Then, our own budget money can be used for the schools, clinics, housing and other things. This is how we intend to open the fiscal space.

5050 Host: Our time is almost off but let me ask you this. The money people owe government, what happen to it? That is the money government gave somebody to do some work and they have not paid. Will government tell them to go free too?

President Sirleaf: No, they can’t go free. That is different. If they use government money, they can’t go free. They got to do the work. They got to go to court. And don’t forget the government also has local debts, which we call “domestic debt”. When we came in it was L $900 million which they say we owe. Some of the things are boggle stocks. Yet they say we owe it. We had to vet it. We brought in people who vetted it in different category. We accepted it because probably the goods were supplied or the work was done. The ones that are questionable, which means we don’t have enough documentation to verify the claims, we will still have to accept. Some of it got to do with rent, some got to do with supply, some of it has to do with public works and many others. We have to pay that. So that’s the domestic debt we have to tackle. This one we are talking about is for the foreign debt. But also we have to do the domestic debt. Every year, we have to budget for that and pay some off. They have paid some of the small categories and I think as soon as the budget is passed, we will start to pay the next category. This is another thing that is on our head.

5050 Host: Now that the debt burden is off our backs, what do you tell your people?

President Sirleaf: We have come a long way. If you go around the country, you see what this government is doing. We don’t have to come out and say, we are doing this one in this community. But what we want to do is to get some of the journalists and some of the NGOs, civil society people, go around the country and look at what is being done. It is not just Monrovia that things are happening. Even with the kind of constraints we had, with the support of our partners, we are working. We are in charge of the country. We are not magicians. We can’t just waive magic wand and everybody have this and that. But we are working on it progressively. Year after year, there is more improvement and with the debt gone, we want to do a little bit more.

5050 Host: Thank you Madam President for responding to our call to come to Sky 107. We are very grateful for your coming and on behalf of the UNMIL Radio, Truth FM, and Power FM. We want to say we are very, very grateful.

President Sirleaf: Thank you and thank you Liberians for being with us through this poi

Ex-rebel denies giving Charles Taylor diamonds

Source:  BBC News
 Mr Taylor is on trial in The Hague A Sierra Leone ex-rebel has denied at a war crimes trial giving "blood diamonds" to former Liberian President Charles Taylor.
Issa Sesay, who is serving a 52-year jail term, said Mr Taylor had not been in charge of the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) rebel group during the war.

Mr Taylor is accused of using diamonds to fuel a conflict in Sierra Leone that cost tens of thousands of lives.

He has pleaded not guilty to 11 charges.

The UN-backed war crimes tribunal in The Hague has spent more than two years hearing the case, with seven months spent with Mr Taylor himself on the stand.

Sesay, 40, was sentenced in October 2009 by the same special court, which was set up to try suspects from the civil war.

Murders and rapes
Mr Taylor, 62, is suspected of selling diamonds and buying weapons for Sierra Leone's RUF rebels, who were notorious for hacking off the hands and legs of civilians during the 1991-2001 civil war.

CHARLES TAYLOR
Continue reading the main story

1997: Elected Liberian president

2003: Arrest warrant issued, steps down, goes into exile in Nigeria

2006: Arrested, sent to Sierra Leone

2007: Trial opens in The Hague

Profile: Charles Taylor

Q&A: Trying Charles Taylor

Tens of thousands of people died in the interlinked conflicts in Sierra Leone and Liberia.

Sesay, the highest profile witness to testify for Mr Taylor's defence, said he had never given Mr Taylor gems and that, as far as he knew, neither had other leaders.

"No, I don't remember giving diamonds to Mr Charles Taylor," he told the court.
He also denied receiving weapons or ammunition from Mr Taylor, and said the first time he met him was in May 2000.

Sesay did acknowledge that some rebel commanders had been responsible for murders and rapes during the conflict, and said that the amputation of limbs had occurred.

But it had not been the policy of the rebel group to use such actions, he said.

Prosecutors have ordered supermodel Naomi Campbell to appear as a witness on 29 July, after claims that she received a diamond from Mr Taylor at a reception in South Africa in 1997.

Ms Campbell has previously declined to provide testimony.

In an interview on the Oprah Winfrey Show, she neither confirmed nor denied that she received the gem, instead saying: "I don't want to be involved in this man's case. He has done some terrible things, and I don't want to put my family in danger."

US actress Mia Farrow, who Ms Campbell allegedly told about the gift, may also testify.

Renewed Promise: Arcelor Mittal’s New Boss Reaffirms Company’s Renewed Vigor

Source: http://www.frontpageafrica.com/newsmanager/anmviewer.asp?a=11114&z=3

07/07/2010 - By: Nat Bayjay, (231)77 402737 & Jetee J. Tarr, Student-Intern (231) 5 479629

Monrovia -

Faced with public anxiety and huge expectations about its operations in a country that is in need of industrial redemption as Liberia struggles to get back on its feet, ArcelorMittal Liberia has unveiled its new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) who seems very poised to make the company’s dream a reality key among which is the shipment of its first iron ores in a year’s time.

Coming from a professional mining engineer background, Rajesh Goel who now replaces Joseph Matthews told a rather interactive news conference in Monrovia that his appointment sends strong signal of his company’s commitment to the signed Mineral Development Agreement (MDA) with the Liberian Government about five years ago.

Rajesh Goel who now replaces Joseph Matthews told a rather interactive news conference in Monrovia that his appointment sends strong signal of his company’s commitment to the signed Mineral Development Agreement (MDA) with the Liberian Government about five years ago.

“My journey here (as CEO) is a very strong signal that we are ready........”, the new CEO said as he provided assurance of some major changes that he would be embarking upon immediately to reach the company’s 2011 shipment target .

ArcelorMittal, the first major foreign investor in post-war Liberia announced the successful conclusion of the review of the MDA signed in 2005 in December 2006 in a landmark agreement of over US$ 1.5 billion that is being dropped into the country’s investment.

The company began operations in Liberia against a background of high expectations about attracting foreign investment to boost the country's drive towards recovery and development. However, the harsh global economic situation did not spare the company’s operation, compelling it to scale down its operations last year that affected some of its Liberian and foreign staffs that were redundant.

During the news conference at its Sinkor Headquarters Tuesday, Goel who disclosed that he in Liberia was during the signing of the 2005 MDA reaffirmed that the company’s scheduled 2011 shipment will go as planned and the company will be hoping to increase its employment.

Said Goel: “By June of next year, the track (railway) will be completed and we will begin the shipment of ores”.

Fast-Tracking Liberia’s Project

Of all its global projects that got retarded due to last year’s financial crisis, the Liberian project of ArcelorMittal will be fast tracked, Goel sounded in a confident statement that is expected to come more as a relief to the employment-thirsty people mainly in the three counties where the company is operational.

CEO Goel: “Liberia’s project is one of the few projects that are being fast-tracked despite the financial crisis”.

According to the MDA, the company will be actively functional in Grand Bassa and Nimba Counties but Bong County adds to the benefitting counties as the 260 kilometers of the company’s inherited railway runs through the central county.

“Liberia’s project is one of the few projects that are being fast-tracked despite the financial crisis”, he assured.

Already, the over 200 kilometers of abandoned railroad that links Yekepa in Nimba County where the mines are located to the Port City of Buchanan in Grand Bassa County is undergoing its second phase of rehabilitation, paving the way for the employment of hundreds of Liberians.

Currently, an annual social contribution of US$ 3.0 million intended for the benefit of communities in the three counties through a dedicated committee comprising of the company and the Government is being provided by ArcelorMittal out of which US$1.5 million goes to Nimba, US$1 million goes to Grand Bassa while Bong County receives US$500,000.

The new CEO stated that some of the former expatriates that helped with the rehabilitation of the railroad’s first phase have since returned and have been at the center of the railroad’s finishing touches ahead of next year’s shipment.

The rehabilitation of the railroad, according to the CEO, has helped in improving the living conditions of residents that live along the railroad with the construction of toilets, schools and other health and sanitation facilities for residents whose villages and towns or huts and houses were tempered with during the rehabilitation works.

Marcus Wleh, responsible for the company’s Social Responsibilities Program, further buttressed the CEO’s explanation of residents’ benefits by adding, “We ensured that we compensated for cash crops by contacting the Agriculture Ministry for the global prices of such trees and compensated for houses that were constructed near the railroad on the basis of cost of construction provided by the Ministry of Public Works. In fact, what we did was to even compensate those who built very close to the railroad within the past one year instead of the convectional 20 to 10 years rules laid down for compensation”.

The company’s current work-strength of about 450 personnel in addition to hundreds more that are indirectly employed via means of sub-contractual agreements will be stepped up to about 1,500 personnel, the Human Resource Manager, Vida Mensah who also attended the press briefing disclosed.

Mr. Goel also revealed the company’s intention of a vocational institute for its technical staffs

Vocational Institute ‘Very Soon’

Among the many contents of the rich package unveiled by the mining-expert CEO is the future establishment of a vocational training by the company, something he said is one of his priorities.

Goel said: “We will establish a vocational training institute very soon that will train Liberians”.

He however clarified that the trainings will strictly be operational trainings and not necessarily constructional and it will enable trained Liberians to operate heavy duty mechanical equipments.



With the taking over of the company’s new CEO and the renewed assurances that go along with it, the anxiety and doubts surrounding the company’s ability to actually begin full scale operations thereby helping to alleviate the plight of the huge unemployed Liberian populace come June of 2011 have only been increased.

Marcus Wleh, head of Social Responsibility, was on hand to explain the company’s Social Development Program & its impact on beneficiaries

The MDA signed in 2005 between the company and the government outlines that, among other things, ArcelorMittal shall:

Provide the Government with financial reports on the quantity of iron ore produced and sold every calendar quarter, and report on all operations and activities at the end of the each financial year; Construct, maintain and operate health facilities in the Concession Area with modern equipment and with procedures with accepted international standards; Provide training for Liberian citizens for skilled, technical, administrative and managerial positions; Provide an annual social contribution of US$ 3.0 million to be managed and disbursed for the benefit of communities in the counties of Nimba, Bong and Grand Bassa by a dedicated committee comprised of the company and the Government; Conduct its operations in accordance with the environmental protection and management law of the Republic and undertake regular environmental audit and assessment;

‘No Room for Complacency: U.S Ambassador Declares at $US15M Grant Signing

07/07/2010 - Nat Nyuan Bayjay, nbayjay@frontpageafrica.com ( 231-77-402-737

“Ghana, Senegal and Mali have enjoyed this Threshold Program, Ghana coming as an example where U.S$ 500,000,000 where alot were being done, and with such funds available to Liberia, a lot can be done in road constructions, health and even improve the lives of the citizens with some jobs creation."

Dr. Linda Thomas Greenfield, U.S. Ambassador to Liberia

Monrovia -


The United States Ambassador to Liberia, Linda Thomas-Greenfield has said the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) given assistance to Liberia is due to the hard work from the government over the past five years.

She said Liberia is now enjoying free press, political debate, open budgets and improving management of natural resources. She stressed that despite the government current efforts in putting citizens in school and the development process, more need to be done.

The Ambassador spoke Tuesday when a US$ 15M dollars grant was signed between the Liberian Government and the MCC for Threshold Program which is expected to last for three years.

Some of the students who will benefit from the fifteen million U.S. grant at signing ceremony Tuesday.

Ambassador Greenfield said the MCC Threshold Program should be handled by the government responsibly in all three areas, the land rights and access, girls’ primary education and trade policy. “Ghana, Senegal and Mali have enjoyed this Threshold Program, Ghana coming as an example where U.S$ 500,000,000 where alot were being done, and with such funds available to Liberia, a lot can be done in road constructions, health and even improve the lives of the citizens with some jobs creation,” the Ambassador said.

She told the audience that “There will be no room for complacency” during the implementation of the funds, adding that many countries do not always complete the transition from Threshold to Compact status because they failed to control corruption, but she is confident that Liberia will pass that stage and reach to the compact status as expected.

The Senior Advisor for MCC, Cassandra Butts in her remarks before the signing ceremony said Liberia and the United States of America share both history and hope for the future, relating to the 1820s when freed African-Americans and freed slaves from United States settled in Liberia. “Today, we remain partners on the number of fronts, from promoting democracy and good governance, to deepening security, to achieving sustainable development,” the Senior Advisor said.

USAID Director Pamela White and Planning and Economic Affairs Minister Amara Konneh sign grant Tuesday.

She added that the US Government, one of its most innovative models for the delivery of development assistance, the MCC invests in poor, but well-governed, countries. “Our partners share our commitment to good policies, to fighting corruption, to investing in their people and to broadening economic freedoms,” Madam Butts emphasized.

Madam Butts said the three years threshold program will focus on the land rights and access, girls’ primary education and trade policy. Saying “The three areas of concentration are necessary since they represent key constraints to economic growth, identified by Liberians themselves and as part of their own national development.”

Madam Butts further said the United States Agency for Development (USAID), headed by Pamela White will bring valuable field presence and expertise and MCC will focus on results through rigorous, transparent monitoring and evaluation.

President Sirleaf with U.S. lawmakers at signing ceremony Tuesday.
For her part, the President of Liberia, Madam Sirleaf said the coming of President Barrack Obama as US first Black President, many information came that the Threshold program will not continue and it was at the time the government was still working to be qualified to be a part of the program. But with President Obama continuing the program, she extends thanks to him and the US Congress for allowing the program to exist.

The Liberian leader said with the establishment of Girls Education Trust (GET), through the help of institutions from the United States and private individuals, more than 5,000 girls are on scholarships currently.

On the issue of girls’ primary education, the president said it has not complicated in getting girls to attend primary school, but when girls reached the junior high or senior level, for some reasons like poverty, early marriages sometimes serve as setbacks for girls to continue their higher education which she said is still a problem that the government is faced with.

She stressed all of the African nations have hoped over the years to have a trade policy instead of aid to put their natural resources to work and sustain their own development process. She extended thanks to the US Congressional delegates and hoped that the grant will improve the development process of Liberia.








Monday, July 5, 2010

Defendants Guilty In Ecobank- Central Bank US$1.1M Case in Liberia

By  M. Welemongai Ciapha, II 07/06/2010 -

Source: http://www.frontpageafrica.com/newsmanager/anmviewer.asp?a=11100&z=3

Monrovia -


A 12-member empanelled jury at Criminal Court “C”, Temple of Justice in Monrovia Monday rendered a unanimous guilty verdict against Mars Jusu Paasewe and his brother Richard Paasewe in the US$1.1 million case.

Records from the court revealed that defendant Mars introduced Richard to the deal for the transfer of the money from the account of the government of Liberia (GOL) to a private account at the Ecobank.

State Prosecutor M. Wilkins Wright told the jurors that the case is about forgery, theft and conspiracy.

Gbotee Peabody, one of the accused, was acquitted of the charges of criminal conspiracy, forgery and theft of property on grounds that Mars, who is the principal defendant, had testified that they were tortured and frightened with snake during an investigation at the headquarters of the National Security Agency (NSA) to lie on Gbotee.

Outlining the theory of the case, M. Wilkins Wright, who is the chief prosecutor for the GOL, told the jurors that the case is about forgery, theft and conspiracy.

Cllr. Wright further told the court that each of the three defendants played a major role in transferring the money.

The state lawyer stated after Gbotee had called Mars and provided details of the plan, Mars informed his brother Richard that an account could be opened in the name of E-Jee Sirleaf, where the money would have been transferred.

He argued that Gbotee processed the forms, which enable them to do the withdrawal of US$2,000 from Ecobank’s Vai Town branch.

On the issue of the defendants’ claim that Cllr. Wright told them to admit to guilt because of President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf’s interest in the case, Cllr. Wright clarified that his action was predicated on the defendants’ sister request to help her two brothers out of the trouble.

Defense Witness Mars Jusu Paasewe was found guilty

“The CBL is not on trial. I went to the prison compound, but I did not tell them to lie. I went there [and] that’s my job. Their sister and I went there and asked for me to help them. I told their sister that the evidence government has against them was cogent,” Cllr. Wright clarified.

He contended that the accused should be brought down guilty of the crimes charged, because if they could forge the president’s signature to withdraw money from the bank, they can even forge her signature to declare war.

He asserted that the acts of corruption are not only carry out by government officials alone, but any act of dishonesty as in the instant case.

“Government is asking you to bring a guilty verdict,” he added.

However, one of the prosecutors, Theophilius C. Gould, informed the jurors not to be carried away by ‘sentiment’ that NSA has a snake to scare suspects.

Cllr. Gould, a long time criminal lawyer, noted that the defendants themselves admitted to the crimes of forgery, theft and criminal conspiracy.

He further maintained that the defendants wanted to embarrass the President of Liberia.

“Criminals have the propensity to destroy this jurisdiction, but you have to set the record straight,” Cllr. Gould averred.

The defense led by David Woah, however, took a different trend in his argument, stating that Charles Sirleaf told the accused that the only way he would help them was to open an account in the name of E-Jee Sirleaf, which he could control.

Atty. Woah told the jurors that Charles used the name of one Gbotoe, different from the defendant Gbotee.

He argued that when Richard was arrested, as one of the defendants, he told the personnel of the NSA that it was Charles (the president’s son) who opened the account for his trust fund.

According to Atty. Woah, a transfer of money from a bank to another bank cannot be made possible without the assistance of an insider.

“Remember, if you convict these defendants, you will be prosecuted for the untouchable. They are innocent,” Atty. Woah contended.

For his part, Atty. S. L. Lofen Keaneh, also a defense lawyer, closing the arguments, said Charles lied and deceived the defendants the he has a trust fund called E-Jee Sirleaf at Ecobank.

The case was presided over by judge James N. Gilayeneh. The final judgment is expected to be handed down five days from Monday.

The state was represented by Cllr. J. Daku Mulbah, Cllr. Augustine C. Fayiah, Cllr. Samuel K. Jacobs, Atty. Stephen J. H. Zargo, while the defense team was headed by Atty. David Woah, Atty. Dallama Solunteh and Atty. L. S. Lofen Keaneh.

‘Taylor Will Destroy’ Liberia -‘If He Returns’, Patrick Kennedy Says


07/06/2010 - Moses Varfee Kowo

Source: http://www.frontpageafrica.com/newsmanager/anmviewer.asp?a=11099&z=3

CAUTIOUS EMBRACE: Representative Patrick Kennedy(D-Rhodes Island) says he appreciates the fact that former Liberian President Charles Taylor might be having a lot of support on the ground but warned all Liberians should see the bigger picture of a democratic Liberia.

Monrovia -

If U.S. Congressman Patrick Kennedy(D-Rhodes Island) had his way, former Liberian President Charles Ghankay should stay as far away from Liberia as possible.

Kennedy, one of eight U.S. lawmakers in Liberia on a three-day working visit to Liberia told reporters after a session with members of the national legislature that it would dangerous for the political future of Liberia if Mr. Taylor is allow to return to the country.

Members of the U.S. delegation with their Liberian counterparts shortly after a meeting Monday. The U.S. lawmakers are on a three-day visit to Liberia.

Congressman Kennedy’s comments come amid ongoing debate and a dark cloud over what the future of Liberia would be in the aftermath of Mr. Taylor after the ongoing trial in the Hague.

Representative Kennedy said he appreciates the fact that Mr. Taylor might be having a lot of support on the ground but warned all Liberians should see the bigger picture of a democratic Liberia.

The issue was resurrected recently when the political leader of the Congress for Democratic Change(CDC)George Manneh Weah declared that he was not opposed to Taylor returning to Liberia.

Weah, in a Radio Netherlands interview said that if Mr. Taylor were acquitted it means he is set free.

Said Weah: "Liberia did not send Charles Taylor to the Hague neither accused Charles Taylor of any crime. So if Sierra Leone accused Mr. Taylor of a crime and he is in the Hague and is acquitted and Liberia also has nothing against Mr. Taylor, he is a free citizen and I think he must go back to his country."

Taylor, who departed Liberia in August 2003, after he was offered asylum, declared shortly before his departure that "God willing, I will be back." Many political observers and die-hard Taylor supporters have been struggling to decipher the meaning of Taylor’s statement.

Taylor, who did not receive financial support from the U.S. during Presidential rule blamed the country's troubles during his term on foreign meddling but challenged the U.S. to help in Liberia and painted himself as a martyr who would be exonerated by historians. "Because Jesus died, we are saved today," Taylor said. "I want to be the sacrificial lamb. I am the whipping boy. It's easy to say 'It's because of Taylor.' After today, there will be no more Taylor to blame."

No Appreciation for Sirleaf, Kennedy BemoansCongressman Kennedy’s comments come amid ongoing debate and a dark cloud over what the future of Liberia would be in the aftermath of Mr. Taylor after the ongoing trial in the Hague.

The son of one of America’s long serving Senators Edward Kennedy called on Liberians to support the work of President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf whom according to him has led a crusade in the international world for support to Liberia and to wave the country huge debt burden.

Said Kennedy: “President Ellen Johnson has a good approach with international financial institutions. If it was not for President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf this country will not be moving as fast as it is now, some people don’t really appreciate that.”

Kennedy further stated that some people need to tell others that this means good thing for Liberia. “The other thing they need to say is that in spite of the trial of Mr. Taylor, people might like the guy but it doesn’t means he is a good person in terms of what he represents in this politics .if he ever to make it back to the country, he will destroy the credibility of Liberia in the international community, the way they will look at his return to the country form people who know and like Liberia , the United states is a part will comment on that because right now as I said Liberia is at a very formative period and somewhat in a dedicate period in the development of its economy, so the wrong message by the people will destruct and sent a wrong message by the people here to the world at the time when everything is important” ,Congressman ended his statement to journalists on capitol.”

The issue of Taylor is emerging as a major political stake in the upcoming 2011 elections. Many observers point to the recent declaration by Weah in support of Taylor’s return to Liberia as a sign that Weah is reaching out to Taylor National Patriotic Party base.

In the aftermath of the 2005 presidential elections, Taylor’s ex-wife Jewel Howard Taylor took the winner of the presidential elections, Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf to task for reneging on her pledge that she would not turn Taylor over for prosecution. Ironically, Weah’s CDC and NPP recently struck a deal to join forces in the 2011 elections.

From 1989 to 1997, Charles Taylor was leader of the National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL), a rebel group that fought in Liberia to overthrow the government of Samuel K. Doe. From 1997 to 2003, Taylor was the democratic president of Liberia. In August 2003, based on an agreement with African Heads of State, Taylor left office after rebel forces had come close to entering the Liberian capital, Monrovia. He was granted political asylum in Nigeria. In March 2006, Taylor was transferred to the custody of the Special Court for Sierra Leone where he now faces trial.

U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas Greenfield

Although the trial is being held in The Hague, Mr. Taylor is still being tried by the Special Court for Sierra Leone. The trial is taking place on the premises of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Taylor is charged with 11 counts of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in Sierra Leone from November 30, 1996, to January 18, 2002. The Prosecutor alleges that Mr. Taylor is responsible for crimes which include murdering and mutilating civilians, including cutting off their limbs; using women and girls as sex slaves; and abducting children adults and forcing them to perform forced labor or become fighters during the conflict in Sierra Leone. Mr. Taylor has pleaded not guilty.

Mr. Taylor is charged on the basis that he allegedly backed Revolutionary United Front (RUF) rebels fighting in Sierra Leone; that he had links with senior leaders in the RUF—such as Foday Sankoh, Sam Bockarie (a.k.a. Mosquito), Issa Sesay, and others—in addition to a second warring faction, the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (AFRC); and that he was responsible for Liberian forces fighting in support of the Sierra Leonean rebels.

FEUDING OVER LIBERIA’S DEBTS: Ghosts Of OAU ’79 In 2011 Political Play

By Rodney D. Sieh

07/05/2010
Source: http://www.frontpageafrica.com/newsmanager/anmviewer.asp?a=11097&z=3

BLAME GAME: While many have been laying the bulk of the blame on President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, research by FrontPageAfrica suggests that there were other players-other than Sirleaf involved at the highest level of the process during the period the loans forgiven last week, were acquired. Besides Sirleaf, Stephen Tolbert - brother of the president also served in the capacity as Minister as did Edwin Williams and James T. Phillips. Sirleaf did serve as the principal minister (Deputy minister of expenditure and debt services) under these minister before she was elevated to the position as minister.

Monrovia - An old ghost from Liberia’s pre-war past is slowly making its way into the debate of the 2011 political discourse. When the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund announced last week its full support for US$4.6 billion debt relief for Liberia, the post-war government seized the moment as a major accoplishment of its five-year reign. While supporters have been trumpeting the achievement as a key ammunition heading into the 2011 presidential and legislative elections, at least one opposition party appears to have found a potential loophole. Looking to score political points, Charles Brumskine’s Liberty Party, In a statement last week, laid much of the blame on the incumbent president when it said, it was constrained to implore President Sirleaf and her government to consider mistakes of the past, during which she was Minister of Finance and a senior policy and decision maker of government, that resulted in such enormous debt of which the people of Liberia, their children, and grandchildren have been saddled for so long.”

So where did all the billions go? Depending on who you ask, there are a lot of blame to go around surrounding the billions of dollars in debt forgiven by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund last week.

For years, conflict and mismanagement left Liberia with a large debt burden of $3.4 billion, owed to multilateral development banks, bilateral creditors, and commercial creditors. In April 2009, most commercial creditors agreed to accept three cents on the dollar for $1.2 billion in outstanding debt. Liberia has made strides to improve public financial management which led to fulfillment of the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative last week.

Months after he ended decades of Americo-Liberian rule, Master Sargeant Samuel K. Doe refused to pay the debt but later spearheaded a campaign requiring government employees to pay one dollar each from their paychecks toward paying off the debt. Dr. Togbah Nah Tipoteh, who was Minister of Planning and Economics Affairs at the time, says Doe’s initiative was partly successful. Says Tipoteh: “After election. Doe said Liberians should pay one dollar each to pay off the debt – and many Liberians did.”

In September 1981, Doe seeking to silence his critics and reassure foreign investors or Liberian businessmen of stability, appointed Colonel Harrison Pennue, a former corporal and Doe loyalist as head of a People’s Redemption Council(P.R.C) committee charged with collecting $36 million owed by private debtors to the defunct Bank of Liberia. Doe came under severe criticism when his government was taken to task for failing to turn over a cent of the funds collected to the central bank.

Time Magazine reported that year that at the same time of Pennue’s committee issues, Doe met with Western diplomats and businessmen to inform them that shakedowns would stop, Pennue ordered his bodyguards to hold down the manager of the government-controlled radio station while the colonel flogged him with a belt. The man's crime: passing Pennue's car. which was stopped along Monrovia's main street. Doe finally jailed Pennue for four days as a "warning" to other P.R.C. members.

But despite the P.R.C.'s excesses, the U.S. Government remained supportive of the regime. While total foreign aid was drastically slashed by the Reagan Administration, U.S. annual assistance to Liberia leapt from $8 million during the last year of Tolbert's presidency to $68.3 million in 1981, an increase, at a time of general retrenchment. Washington, according to Time Magazine, explained at the time that there was "no visible alternative" to the Doe regime.

Dr. Tipoteh recalls that Sirleaf, minister at the time also served as Deputy Minister prior to becoming Minister. “Even she has admitted that a lot of the aid came under her watch,” Tipoteh explained.

From Tolbert to Sirleaf

While many are laying the bulk of the blame on Sirleaf, research by FrontPageAfrica suggests that there were other players-other than Sirleaf involved at the highest level of the process during the period the loans were acquired.

Besides Sirleaf, Stephen Tolbert - brother of the president also served in the capacity as Minister as did Edwin Williams and James T. Phillips. Sirleaf did serve as the principal minister (Deputy minister of expenditure and debt services) under these minister before she was elevated to the position as minister.

But prior to the OAU 1979 summit, President Tolbert lobbied at an OAU conference for Liberia to host the OAU Summit in Liberia so that he would be its Chairman. This was approved hence the OAU summit of Heads of States and Government was held in Liberia. Among the projects undertaken for the summit were: New terminal built at RIA together with a VIP Lounge and a Hotel; Road paved from RIA to OAU center via Monrovia and Gardnerville; New bridge constructed (Johnson street bridge); New ministry of foreign affairs constructed; New conference center constructed in Virginia; 50 new villas constructed in Virginia for the 50 heads of states attending the conference; Hotel constructed at the center in Virginia for guests; New road constructed and paved from Monrovia to Bensonville - the president home; 50 Mercedes Benz purchased from Germany for the 50 heads of states. a ship; chartered from Germany to transport these vehicles to Monrovia; To accommodate additional guests, two floating ships were leased from abroad and used as hotels for about a month.

Doe Govt approached Paris Club on Debts
A former Finance Minister who preferred anonymity for this report informed FPA that all of the projects were financed from loans obtained from foreign governments, World Bank, ADB and IMF and mainly Commercial Banks with high interest rates.

According to the minister, when Sirleaf became minister, the government of Liberia leased the Penthouse at the top of the Ministry of Education - Broad Street for her and the lease was paid for up lease up to the time of the coup. When the coup occurred GOL loan obligations to creditor nations and banks was about US $2.5B - Dr. Tipoteh was made Minister of Planning while Perry Zulu was minister of Finance.

When Doe became Head of State, a freeze was placed on loans on the government - both banks and government. The Doe government had to approach the PARIS Club - Creditor nation debts for rescheduling as well as the LONDON Club for the rescheduling of Banks debts. “Several times GOL was in Paris and London to do this,” said the former minister.

But while many have laid the blame on Sirleaf, Doe was not completely shut out. During his reign, Doe received GRANTS for the United States Government to build the police and AFL barracks; The US Government also gave GOL through USAID - annual grants known as ESF (Economic Support Fund) to assist reducing some its debts. These funds were reportedly handled by the US Embassy and USAID.

Psychologically, a plus
Emmanuel Gardner, a former Minister of Planning and Economics Affairs says most of the funds borrowed went toward infrastructure development: “During the Tubman and Tolbert eras there were no roads as a result those monies went toward building infrastructures. Most of the money went into infrastructure development largely. But the mere fact that the debt is not on our head again, psychologically, it is a plus.”

The debate over where the monies went resurfaced last week when the opposition Liberty Party cautioned the ruling Unity Party government against making similar mistakes which put Liberian in the position to accumulate millions of dollars in debt. The party went on to note that much of the debt forgiven was accumulated during the period when the current President Sirleaf was Minister of Finance. In fact, critics say, those debts were acquired particularly during the summit of the Organization of African Unity(OAU) and Sirleaf was the principal technician in acquiring those debts.

Sirleaf Admits on Kuwait Loan
Welcoming the IMF and World Bank announcement of debt relief last week, President Sirleaf took responsibility only for one of the debts, when she said during her recent visit to Kuwait, she and the Kuwaiti government spoke about a loan signed 32 years ago for road construction, and how to clear up that debt.

Said Sirleaf: “Back in 1978, I personally went to Kuwait and signed that loan myself, for US$6.7 million. We built the Cape Mount road from that money, and that road is still good today. But because we didn’t pay back the loan, the debt has grown to US$12 million. The Kuwaitis want to come back to help us with other roads, once we settle this matter.”

Ironically, critics of the post-war government point out that much of the debts incurred by Liberia have been described as commercial and was accumulated during the hosting of the 1979 summit of the Organization of African Unity(OAU) during which time, infrastructures like Hotel Africa, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and multiple villas were constructed to host African heads of states during the period because there were not sufficient hotels. The Government of Liberia went as far during the time to acquire a floating boat which it rented and used as lodging for some of the international guests.

The irony, critics say is that after the Tolbert years, Liberia received very little in terms of loans in the administrations which followed. During the Samuel Doe, Charles Taylor eras there were no loans and Liberia had to shift attention to the Paris Club.

Prior to the OAU conference, much of the road and infrastructural developments were stagnant, thus, the OAU conference prompted the Tolbert government to build roads throughout greater Monrovia – from Bushrod Island to western Liberia. From New Georgia, Gardnersville, and Barnesville to Paynesville.

Now years later, critics are pointing to the era where much of the debt Liberia has now been forgiven to suggest that the ruling post-war government should not take credit for something it created in the first place.

UP vs. LP: Differences on waivers
Taking exception to the Liberty Party’s position, the Unity Party, in a statement Sunday said while it welcomed the commendation of President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and her government by Executive Committee of Liberty Party for her leadership in clearing Liberia’s US$4.6 billion external debt, it was important to note that the Liberty Party was not supportive of the Sirleaf Administration when it embarked on its economic program in 2006, and is therefore most gratified that a policy consensus across party lines appears to be emerging. We therefore gratefully thank its Executive Committee for the commendation of the Sirleaf Administration for reaching the completion point under the HIPC initiative; retiring a $1,300 debt burden for each and every Liberian citizen.”

The ruling party also took issue with the opposition party’s call on the government to the fact that debt waivers obligate the assisted government to devote the waived debt proceeds to capacity development, institution building, and infrastructural development. “Unless these are begun urgently, debt waiver will not positively impact Liberia and its future,” the Liberty Party said.

Countering the Liberty Party, supporters of the post-war government explain that there is no such thing as waived debt proceeds that can be used for any purpose since this debt which consist of huge accrued interest and penalties as a result of past administrations not servicing the debt, is simply forgiven. Administration officials are quick to not that there is only a little fiscal space to promote accelerated development.

Relief key to recovery
Amid the internal wrangling over the waiver of post-war Liberia’s debt of yesteryears, the ruling party is enjoying a swarm of praise over the achievement. The U.S Department of the Treasury last week, declared that reaching "completion point" under the Enhanced Heavily-Indebted Poor Countries Initiative (HIPC) recognizes Liberia's performance under its International Monetary Fund (IMF) program and its excellent progress on adopting and implementing economic reforms in the face of a challenging economic environment both domestically and internationally. "Today's decision marks a major achievement in Liberia's progress towards economic sustainability and the international community's recognition of that progress. This is a great milestone for Liberia," said Under Secretary for International Affairs Lael Brainard.

Relief of Liberia's debt burden is crucial to Liberia's recovery after years of violence and civil war. To allow Liberia to move forward in rebuilding its economy and in light of its achievement under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative, the United States intends to cancel 100 percent of its remaining claims after the September meeting of the Paris Club of international creditors, bringing the total amount of U.S. debt relief for Liberia under HIPC to more than $400 million. The U.S. has meanwhile urged Liberia's other bilateral creditors to be equally generous."

Since 2008, Treasury technical advisors have been working closely with Liberia's Ministry of Finance to implement a Code of Ethics, strengthen internal controls to deter and detect corruption, and improve tax collection procedures.

In accordance with the Enhanced HIPC Initiative and the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative, "completion point" will bring cancellation of an estimated $2.7 billion in debt from the Paris Club, the IMF, World Bank, African Development Bank and other creditors. The cancellation marks the culmination of a process that will ultimately result in a greater than 90 percent reduction of the debt inherited by Liberia's government, which has been estimated at $3 billion in 2007 (in net present value terms).

With the IMF and World Bank agreeing to support cancellation of Liberia’s debt, attention will now be shifted to the Paris Club where Liberia still faces a daunting task to press for relief of debts from countries under the club’s umbrella.

In the foreseeable future though, the issue appears to be emerging as a hot bottom topic for an incumbent government heralding it as an achievement and the political opposition looking to score countering points. For now, many Liberians are basking in the glory.

Amid the debate, Tipoteh who was Planning Minister after the coup of 1980, says Liberians should at least feel good that the government has put the post-war nation in the position to burrow again. Regardless of what happens with Liberia in the aftermath of the achievement of the HIPC completion point, the road to 2011 appears to have a lot of interesting twists and turn. The latest, regarding the debt relief issue appears to be generating some traction. How the end justifies the means remains to be seen. For now though, the ruling party is hopeful that the cancellation of debts marks the beginning of the end of the post-war nation’s economic blues. For those on the outside looking in the debate over whose responsible may be in play for some time as the post-war nation prepares for perhaps the most crucial elections in the history of Africa’s oldest republic.

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Our Liberators In Retrospect: Where Did They Go Wrong? (Part I)

Written By Alfred Johnson

7/14/2010

“….The reason is that many of our heroes’ refusal or inability to know went to take off the veil of idealism and allow themselves to be guided by realities, made them to adopt policies that were too extreme like the “Africa is for Africans” philosophy promulgated by Marcus Garvey. This lack of guidance from reality also impaired their abilities to design and maintain a leadership structure that was reflective of their believe in freedom and democracy and a viable longitudinal blueprint that who have immensely benefited generations of Africans…” -Alfred Johnson

From Kwame Nkrumah’s “I speak of freedom “speech to Nobel Laureate Nelson Mandela and disadvantaged South Africans’ victory over Apartheid in South Africa. From Julius Nyerere’s demonstration of “flashing verbalism” at the OAU’s 1964 Summit and his bloodless struggle for an independent Tanganyika to Ahmed Ben Bella’s improbable yet unwavering struggle for an independent Algeria, Africa has produced some of the greatest advocates of social justice the continent and mankind has ever seen; individuals, who, against all odds, questioned the status quo and implicatively declared “normalcy, never again.” They did not just inspire their people to believe in the possibilities of equality, independence, and self-reliance but unrelentingly worked to make it come to fruition.

The continent (Africa) also paid host to two of the greatest champions of non-violent struggles including Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Indian founding father Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. In fact, the latter’s (Gandhi) inspiration for a non-violent struggle is inextricably linked to its test and success in Africa, precisely, South Africa where he succeeded in bringing national and eventually international attention to the inhumane treatment of Indians in South Africa.

However, more than half a century later and following series of successful independence struggles, our people are still sweltering with what Dr. King called “the heat of withering injustice.” The continent future remains as beclouded as it was in the earliest part of the twentieth century; Senseless civil wars, coups upon coups, famines and starvation, high mortality rates, unimaginable division, and the list goes on. The ironies involve are inexplicable. A continent with abundant natural resources yet many of its people continue to wallow in the valley of impoverishment. It is the cradle of civilization but also the scene of barbaric acts. Additionally, (as previously stated) it is the birthplace of some of the greatest advocates of social justice and freedom humanity has ever seen, yet, the staging ground for bloody coups and home of vicious dictatorial regimes.

These painfully ironic but indisputable facts have generations of Africans and the world at large asking, what went wrong? How can a continent with such history be the face of irony? Did our champions refuse to understand that the fight and victory over Colonialism was just the beginning and not the end? Were they (African Liberators) unctuous in their independent fight; exploiting our people’s grievances and legitimate concerns and using it as a springboard to political prominence? Where did they/we go wrong and how can we learn from their mistakes and positively shape the destiny of our continent.

From all indications, champions like Nkrumah, Lumumba, Olympio, Barclay and the rest initial intentions were genuinely grounded in their desire to liberate their people (us) from imperialistic rules to self-governance, empowerment, and determination. In the case of Pres. Edwin Barclay, his intention was to move away from the policy of “us v them “and extend a hand of mutual respect to indigenous Liberians, soliciting their opinions on issues of national concern. Sadly, those good intentions, in many instances, did not work as evident in the present state of our continent.

The reason is that many of our heroes’ refusal or inability to know went to take off the veil of idealism and allow themselves to be guided by realities, made them to adopt policies that were too extreme like the “Africa is for Africans” philosophy promulgated by Marcus Garvey. This lack of guidance from reality also impaired their abilities to design and maintain a leadership structure that was reflective of their believe in freedom and democracy and a viable longitudinal blueprint that who have immensely benefited generations of Africans.

Like Michael Eric Dyson, author of I may not get there with you, a book in which he gave readers a comprehensive understanding of Dr. King’s inspiring intellectualism and his moral failings, I am cognizant of the fact that this piece will not receive the nicest of response from some of my fellow Africans. Reason being, we find it revulsive and continentally unpatriotic to bring into the spot light, the flaws of our heroes. However, I take refuge in my unflinching belief that as the next generation of (public and private sectors) African leaders, any attempt to change the trajectory of our continent is contingent upon our ability to understand our past; objectively analyzing the achievements and failures of our founding fathers because in their history lies many of the fundamental causes and solutions of and to our problem(s). Moreover, it is an established fact that these people were not saints they had flaws and they knew it as apparent in this quote from Mandela “…I want to be known as Mandela, a man with weaknesses, some of which are fundamental and a man who is committed” (think exist).

Saturday, July 3, 2010

LEAD Organizing For Liberia

Media Talking Point.

What is LEAD Liberia?
• LEAD Organizing For Liberia is part of LEAD Liberia, a non—partisan political group that sends one message to our elected officials across Liberia, which is “Do the right thing” and stop playing politics with our future and the national interest of our beloved country (Liberia).

• LEAD Liberia was founded in 2010 with the goal to….

• Engage, Educate, and Empower the people of Liberia

• Demand respect, accountability and transparency from our elected officials across Liberia.

• Build grassroots force for change through citizen participation in government across Liberia.

• The national office is in Monrovia, Liberia but there are other local Development Team of Organizers and Advisory Team working in communities across Liberia.

Are there a lot of people in Liberia that are not empowered or politicians that are taking advantage of their positions, while keeping the people unformed? (Liberia’s Fact)

• The literacy rate in Liberia is about 48%. (CIA World Fact Book)

• Despite five years of peace in Liberia, the majority of Liberians are not engaged by their elected officials.

• Despite five years of peace in Liberia, the majority of Liberians are not empowered by their elected officials.

• Despite five years of peace in Liberia, the majority of Liberians are not engaged in government—neither are they informed of decisions that affect their day-to-day activities.

How does LEAD Liberia Engage, Educate And Empower The People?

• One way LEAD Liberia engages, educates and empowers the people is through our “Survey of Citizen Participation in Government” identifies local leaders through networking with grassroots organizations and community’s advocates.

• Through coordinating and organizing community town hall meetings thereby giving the local people and the leaders of the communities the opportunity to listen, suggest, and talk with elected officials in their respective communities, while demanding respect, transparency and accountability in governance.

How can our local community get involved with LEAD Organizing For Liberia?

• By taking LEAD Liberia “Survey of Citizen Participation in Government”

• By organizing community events that engage, educate and empower the local people in the community.

• By calling their local representatives and senators to demand respect, transparency and accountability in government.

• By attending LEAD Liberia’s community events.

• By talking to their neighbors and friends about citizen participation in government.

• By contributing to the welfare of the Liberian’s State and the people.

• By making suggestions to LEAD Liberia Community Organizing Team.

• By sponsoring a specific LEAD Liberia’s Project.

How can our elected officials get involved with the people in their respective communities?

• By doing the right thing and stop playing politics with our future and the national interest of our beloved country (Liberia).

• By organizing town hall meetings with the local people that got them elected thereby informing the people of progress and pending decisions that could affect their respective communities.

• By attending LEAD Liberia’s community events.

• By talking and listening to the people in their respective districts.

• By investing in their respective districts and the people.

• By contributing to the welfare of the Liberian’s State and the people in their respective districts.

Thank you and May God bless the Republic of Liberia.

Abraham Hoff
Chief Community Organizer

Contact: LEAD Organizing For Liberia @ 077384990 and/or leadliberia@yahoo.com.

Friday, July 2, 2010

President Tubman Haunting Legacy


By T. Q. Harris, Jr.
Thursday, July 1, 2010 6:01 AM
A  flurry of activity has begun in order to ensure that the 2011 Presidential  and Legislative elections produce a new generation of leaders across the  three Branches of government who will have the mandate, respect and support  of the Liberian people. The transition no doubt will amaze, excite, and  inspire even those who have lost hope. Liberia is being repositioned to  become a powerhouse in the not distant future. It will again provide  leadership and be a voice for justice. The 'First Among
Many' shall remain  a beacon of freedom and equality in Africa. The old has passed away and now  all things have become new. More than 200,000 men, women and children have  died that this day may come. Therefore, no one should underestimate the  hunger for change.
We have embarked upon this endeavor knowing full  well there's a price to pay. Climbing out of the pit of poverty, illiteracy  and disease up onto the pinnacle of confidence, prosperity and respect will  involve pain…much pain indeed; simply, because transitions by their very  nature are painful.
And people generally do not like change or parting with  the familiar, not even that which causes destruction. But change we  must.
The dysfunctional Liberia created in 1847 where for decades the  dark skins battled the light skins and indigenous were the pawns will no  longer exist as of 2012. Likewise the age where a person's last name  signified position of privilege – though undeserved - also will come to an  end. In the new
Liberia merit will determine how high one rises or how low  they sit. Never again will you be asked this intimidating question: Do you  know who I am? Because they shall be known by their fruit.
Tubman's  impact on the Liberian society

How do we fix Liberia without first  identifying the root causes of the problem? What is at the root of  Liberia's problems, you might ask? The answer to this question may surprise  many, considering for a long time emphases have been placed on the symptoms  rather than the disease. To
effectively remedy the nagging ills and alter  Liberia's current trajectory, the haunting legacy of President William V.  S. Tubman must be completely eradicated. Among its negative consequences is  the assassination of Presidents Tolbert and Doe as well as the  15-year carnage. Progress in large part will depend on Liberians'  willingness to rid this nation of the devastating effects of Tubman's  leadership.
But first, it is important to understand how the rivalry  between the former slaves contributed to Tubman's success in shaping  Liberia to the extent he did. Almost immediately upon setting foot on the  land, light skin and dark skin slaves engaged in a fierce rivalry which  continued unabated for the better part of a century. Throughout this period  the light skin slaves dominated practically all facets of society. But in  1944 a dramatic shift occurred. The very dark skinned William V. S.  Tubman became Liberia's 18th president. His election was a mixed bag.  It diminished the light skin-dark skin rivalry, elevated the status of  the indigenous, and set the stage for growth. This, however, was achieved  as a result of Tubman's heavy-handed approach to governance where  political
expediency took precedence over morality; and criminals were  celebrated.
Not long following his inauguration, Tubman created what  has now become the "imperial presidency" by muscling out his political  rivals while at the same time tactfully winning over the indigenous (the  largest population group) as a counterweight. In short order he decimated  the
opposition, effectively transforming Liberia into a one party state.  And, for the duration of his tenure, Tubman's True Whig Party was the  only vehicle for political expression. Hence, it shaped the thought,  opinion and behavior of the entire nation. Nonconformance was not an  option. In
the new order, the Presidency stood supreme; even above the  law.
Tubman's 27-year reign could very well be described as the best of  time and the worst of time. Liberia during this period experienced  significant economic growth and was brought squarely into the modern  age…thanks to World War II and the Cold War. Yet, on the other hand, it was  a time of unparalleled moral decadence, corruption, indifference to rule of  law, witchcraft practices, dependency, greed, as well as extreme fear  amongst the population resulting from widespread mistrust. And it is fair  to say under the Tubman administration Liberia lost its innocence as well  as its bearings.
At the time of his death in 1971, President Tubman  had successfully molded
the hearts and minds of an entire generation,  particularly the men and women Liberians have turned to for leadership. But  sadly they are the embodiment of a dysfunctional age. Like their esteemed  patron, these individuals would rather watch the nation disintegrate than  step aside for the greater good. True to form, they have in the past 30  years pitted brother against brother in order to gain power. And it's no  surprise fear and apathy has returned, as morality is pushed to the back of  the line. This, in its most conspicuous display, is President Tubman's  haunting legacy which must be brought to an end if Liberia is to  prosper.
TGLs - a dangerous and destructive group
The imperative  of this nation's survival demands that we retire Tubman-generation-leaders  (TGLs) no later than 2011. They have been ineffective, even dangerous and  destructive. Like Tubman himself, TGLs are a contradiction, often placing  style before substance. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and Charles Taylor illustrate  perfectly the nature of TGLs. At the moment, Ellen is more concerned about  her image as Africa's first female president rather than exposing the fact  rule of law (the cornerstone of any viable nation) is nonexistent in  Liberia. And, paradoxically, she is
promoting a book about her life, but is  not in the least embarrassed by the devastation she brought upon the nation  that gave her life. This is not unlike President Tubman who smoked  expensive Cuban cigars and drank the finest whiskey money could buy as he  sailed on his multi-million
Dollar yacht unfazed by the severe shortage of  schools in the country. TGLs are known to present an impressive image even  when they have nothing concrete to offer. The impeccably dressed – top hat,  tuxedo wearing - Tubman often received foreign guests in grand style,  leading the grand
march at banquets while his people languished in abject  poverty.
As it relates to contradictions, Amos Claudius Sawyer (a TGL)  is rightfully the poster boy. A key opponent of the Americo-Liberian  hegemony and a leading advocate for justice and equality; Sawyer – the  activist - failed miserably when given the opportunity to lead. And he  exhibited a
major character defect by agreeing to head the Interim  Government of National Unity (IGNU), having previously served as chairman  of the committee tasked with writing the Liberian Constitution. In his  greed for power, Amos Sawyer violated the Constitution when he opted to  become interim head of state while the sitting vice president was able to  carry on the affairs of state following President Doe's assassination.  This willful breach created a constitutional crisis that lasted seven  long years and claimed more than 200,000 lives.
Charles Taylor, on  the other hand, was not only a TGL, but also a practitioner of the Tubman  doctrine. This clearly showed in his brutal strategy to acquire absolute  power in the very early stages. Right from the start, he muscled out Ellen  Johnson Sirleaf from the leadership of the
NPFL; and in short order  asserted supremacy by eliminating all potential rivals - a move not unlike  Tubman's deadly 1955 assault against the opposition. Wanting to appear in  every way like the 18th president, Charles Taylor even delivered his  inaugural address in a cadence quite
familiar to listeners of Tubman's  lengthy speeches.
As Charles Taylor attempted to revive the Tubman era,  Ellen Johnson Sirleaf was dusting off President Tubman's rules book. Almost  immediately following the inauguration, she held a private meeting with  Charles Taylor at the Executive Mansion. Four hours later Ellen emerged to  publicly
announce her endorsement of Charles Taylor's so-called economic  plan. But, in yet another demonstration of a character defect, Ellen within  24 hours retracted her endorsement.
Integrity has always been a  challenge for TGLs. Prior to Charles Taylor's forced exit from Liberia, a  group of TGLs under the leadership of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and Amos Sawyer  organized a so-called peace conference in Burkina Faso under the auspices  of President Blasé Compaore. This
disgusting show of insensitivity and  total disregard for Compaoré's contribution to the carnage in Liberia is  further evidence that TGLs will go to extremes in order to obtain  power.
And despite the preponderance of evidence confirming Ellen  Johnson Sirleaf's role in organizing and financing the NPFL, she has  continued to deny these accusations, though never willing to do so under  oath. There is, however, no denying that NPFL fighters did receive training  in Libya
to overthrow the Doe Government and now Ellen Johnson Sirleaf,  Maummar Gaddafi and Blasé Compaoré are buddies. Her sudden intimate bond  with the men most responsible for Liberia's destruction creates doubt as to  Ellen's truthfulness regarding the violence that destroyed Liberia. After  all, Gaddafi armed the NPFL while Compaoré sent mercenaries to  murder Liberians. Yet Ellen Johnson Sirleaf can't seem to get enough of  them and their families. Why is she cozying up to known enemies of the  Liberian people? The answer is simple: Ellen Johnson Sirleaf is no  different than Charles Taylor; and as long TGLs are calling the shots,  Liberia will never
prosper.
Liberians have common  sense

Elections 2011 will no doubt mark the end not only of President  Tubman's haunting legacy, but also the confusion, deception and ignorance  that have become a mainstay of Liberian politics. It is unfortunate the  destructive behavior of TGLs has created the impression that those who seek  leadership positions are abnormal, power-hungry men and women. This  couldn't be
further from the truth. Liberians in general who seek elected  office are patriotic and have common sense; however, the same cannot be  said of TGLs. They are obsessed with power and must lead regardless of  the circumstances. They lack respect for one another and are incapable  of
compromise. Count the number of TGLs who since 1984 have formed  political parties and run for president; it is then easy to see that a  small group of misguided individuals are responsible for the chaos. Every  election season they come out of hibernation and confuse the electorate by  dividing
into multiple camps, only to later merge and forge alliances which  do not last. For the past 30 years TGLs have been the cause of  continuous instability primarily because of deep-seated hatred and mistrust  of one another.
Most Liberians have no desire to work in government  or become president of the country. TGLs, on the contrary, will do almost  anything to get a high-ranking position in the government. Because they  came of age at a time and in a culture where being an official of  government was the most
prestigious career pursuit. With this mindset, they  feel worthless outside of government. This is why it is hard to find TGLs  with advanced degrees starting a business or pursuing research. Rather,  they all head for a desk in a government office, and will fight tooth and  nail to get it.
As their colleagues in other nations were making  significant advances, TGLs spent their time bickering, squabbling, waging  war and killing for government jobs…and all wanting to become president at  the same time. Greed and selfishness led them to practically give away the  nation's
valuable resources for weapons and other useless trinkets. On  their watch, Liberia has fallen far behind, severely lagging in every  critical area.
Changing our fortunes

More than a change of  leaders, Liberians must embrace a new order. It will take a new vision as  well as a paradigm shift which can only come through a new generation of  leaders unencumbered by the Tubman albatross. As a people, we must do  what's best for our common survival. It's obvious we must no longer rely on  the international community, the UN, or any entity
for that matter to do  what we ourselves are capable of. It's high time we change our fortunes and  put this nation on the right path. Everyone must become involved. There is  no need for further violence. However, those who see the facts and insist  on continuing with business as usual shall leave us no other alternative  than to stop them by any means necessary. We will not stand idly by and  watch the destruction of yet another generation.
In the coming months a  list will be published containing names of individuals who are likely to  experience the wrath of Liberians should they in 2011 attempt to seek  elected office. You may help by emailing us the name of anyone you believe  should be included in this list.
The time has come for  Tubman-generation-leaders to bow out gracefully and avoid a shameful exit  similar to that experienced by Charles Taylor who was given numerous  opportunities to avoid his current predicament; and yet he failed to heed  the warning not knowing when to quit. Let there be no doubt, those who have  harmed the Liberian people will answer for their
crimes. So help us  God.
The Author: Mr. T Q. Harris, Jr. is currently the General  Chairman of
Liberia Contemporees United Patriotic and Strong (Contemp  UPS)
and a former vice presidential nominee. He can  be
reached by phone in the US at (562) 216-3177 or (562) 824-0385 or by  email
him at liberia1@charter.net  and visit the friends of TQ  website:
www.friendsoftq.com

News Headline

Inside Liberia with Bernard Gbayee Goah

Everyone is a genius

Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. – A Einstein

Drawing the line in Liberia

Crimes sponsored, committed, or masterminded by handful of individuals cannot be blamed upon an entire nationality. In this case, Liberians! The need for post-war justice is a step toward lasting peace, stability and prosperity for Liberia. Liberia needs a war crimes tribunal or some credible legal forum that is capable of dealing with atrocities perpetrated against defenseless men, women and children during the country's brutal war. Without justice, peace shall remain elusive and investment in Liberia will not produce the intended results. - Bernard Gbayee Goah



Men with unhealthy characters should not champion any noble cause

They pretend to advocate the cause of the people when their deeds in the dark mirror nothing else but EVIL!!
When evil and corrupt men try to champion a cause that is so noble … such cause, how noble it may be, becomes meaningless in the eyes of the people - Bernard Gbayee Goah.

If Liberia must move forward ...

If Liberia must move forward in order to claim its place as a civilized nation amongst world community of nations, come 2017 elections, Liberians must critically review the events of the past with honesty and objectivity. They must make a new commitment to seek lasting solutions. The track records of those who are presenting themselves as candidates for the position of "President of the Republic of Liberia" must be well examined. Liberians must be fair to themselves because results from the 2011 elections will determine the future of Liberia’s unborn generations to come - Bernard Gbayee Goah

Liberia's greatest problem!

While it is true that an individual may be held responsible for corruption and mismanagement of funds in government, the lack of proper system to work with may as well impede the process of ethical, managerial, and financial accountability - Bernard Gbayee Goah

What do I think should be done?

The situation in Liberia is Compound Complex and cannot be fixed unless the entire system of government is reinvented.
Liberia needs a workable but uncompromising system that will make the country an asylum free from abuse, and other forms of corruption.
Any attempt to institute the system mentioned above in the absence of rule of law is meaningless, and more detrimental to Liberia as a whole - Bernard Gbayee Goah

Liberia's Natural Resources
Besides land water and few other resources, most of Liberia’s dependable natural resources are not infinite, they are finite and therefore can be depleted.
Liberia’s gold, diamond, and other natural resources will not always be an available source of revenue generation for its people and its government. The need to invent a system in government that focuses on an alternative income generation method cannot be over emphasized at this point - Bernard Gbayee Goah

Liberia needs a proper system
If Liberians refuse to erect a proper system in place that promotes the minimization of corruption and mismanagement of public funds by government institutions, and individuals, there will come a time when the value of the entire country will be seen as a large valueless land suited on the west coast of Africa with some polluted bodies of waters and nothing else. To have no system in place in any country is to have no respect for rule of law. To have no respect for rule of law is to believe in lawlessness. And where there is lawlessness, there is always corruption - Bernard Gbayee Goah

Solving problems in the absence of war talks

As political instability continues to increase in Africa, it has become abundantly clear that military intervention as a primary remedy to peace is not a durable solution. Such intervention only increases insecurity and massive economic hardship. An existing example which could be a valuable lesson for Liberia is Great Britain, and the US war on terror for the purpose of global security. The use of arms whether in peace keeping, occupation, or invasion as a primary means of solving problem has yield only little results. Military intervention by any country as the only solution to problem solving will result into massive military spending, economic hardship, more fear, and animosity as well as increase insecurity. The alternative is learning how to solve problems in the absence of war talks. The objective of such alternative must be to provide real sustainable human security which cannot be achieved through military arm intervention, or aggression. In order to achieve results that will make the peaceful coexistence of all mankind possible, there must be a common ground for the stories of all sides to be heard. I believe there are always three sides to every story: Their side of the story, Our side of the story, and The truthBernard Gbayee Goah

DISCLAIMER

Statements and opinions expressed in articles, reviews and other materials herein are those of the authors. While every care has been taken in the compilation of information on this website/blog, and every attempt made to present up-to-date and accurate information, I cannot guarantee that inaccuracies will not occur. Inside Liberia with Bernard Gbayee Goah will not be held responsible for any claim, loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of any information within these pages or any information accessed through this website/blog. The content of any organizations websites which you link to from this website/blog are entirely out of the control of Inside Liberia With Bernard Gbayee Goah, and you proceed at your own risk. These links are provided purely for your convenience. They do not imply Inside Liberia With Bernard Gbayee Goah's endorsement of or association with any products, services, content, information or materials offered by or accessible to you at said organizations site.